Legal Opinion
Appeal of New Hampshire Department of Employment Security
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 7, 1996No. 94-681PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The respondent, Maurice Tandy, filed a complaint pursuant to the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act, RSA chapter 275-E, against the petitioner, New Hampshire Department of Employment Security (DES). See RSA 275-E:4, I (Supp. 1995). He alleges that the DES discharged him for reporting its violation of a federal veterans’ preference law. See 38 U.S.C. § 4103A(a)(l) (1988); RSA 275-E:2, 1(a) (Supp. 1995). The New Hampshire Department of Labor (DOL) found the complaint valid, and the DES appeals. See RSA 275-E:4, II (Supp. 1995); RSA 541:6 (1974). We affirm.
Tandy is a disabled, Vietnam-era veteran.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Appeal of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Appeal of Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Appeal of Osram Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Clark v. N.H. Dep't of Emp't Sec.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- McDill v. Environamics Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Appeal of MontplaisirSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.