Legal Opinion
Appeal of Montplaisir
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 18, 2001No. 2000-145PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The petitioner, Mary Ellen Montplaisir, appeals a decision by the New Hampshire Department of Labor (DOL) that she failed to prove that the defendant, Rosa Roofeh, M.D., P.C. (Dr. Roofeh), violated the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (Act), RSA 275-E:2, 1(b) (1999). On appeal, Montplaisir argues the DOL erred when it failed to apply a mixed motive analysis on the evidence presented. We vacate and remand.
*299The record and the hearing officer’s decision support the following facts. In July 1998, the petitioner was hired by Dr. Roofeh as office manager. The petitioner had previously been employed by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fernandes v. Costa Bros. MasonryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dennis v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Madeja v. MPB Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Appeal of HardySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Wolters v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Appeal of HardySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.