Bloomingdale v. Maas
New York Supreme Court
Motion to continue a temporary .injunction restraining the defendants, during the pendency of this action, from prosecuting certain writs of attachment in the city of Spokane in the State of Washington.
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.
This is a motion to continue a temporary injunction restraining the defendants, during the pendency of this action, from prosecuting certain writs of mandamus in the city of Spokane, in the State of Washington. The plaintiff is the general assignee of the firm of M. & A. D. Bettman, under an assignment dated March 5, 1898. Among the assets conveyed by said assignment were two certain debts of one Cowley and wife, who reside in the State of Washington, upon which debts judgments had been recovered in that State. The defendants are residents of the State of Hew York. The plaintiff succeeded, in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Howard National Bank v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by1 opinion
- Florence Trading Corp. v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942