Legal Opinion

Howard National Bank v. King

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts and nature of the action sufficiently appear from the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

The assignment which is attacked in this action was made in the State of New Jersey by the defendant Locke, who was a citizen of that State. This instrument, although made a subject of contention in the courts of this State, has been finally adjudged to be valid by the law of the State in which it was made (Boese v. King, 78 N. Y. 471).

Plaintiffs, however, contend that as to property of the assignor situated within this jurisdiction at the time of the execution of the assignment, the validity of the transfer must be determined by the law of New York, and not by that of New Jersey. And that as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Boese v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bloomingdale v. MaasNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. O'Neil v. NagleNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1888
  3. O'Neill v. NagleCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API