Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Esposito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 5, 1979, dismissing the amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 1), a defense based on documentary evidence, in this action arising under the Pari-Mutuel Revenue Law (L 1940, ch 254, as amd) as to political party officers having any dealings with horse race tracks, and a subsequent judgment entered on said order on October 9, 1979, unanimously reversed, on the facts and the law, and the motion to dismiss the amended complaint denied, without costs or disbursements. Section 107 of the Pari-Mutuel Revenue Law (L 1940, ch 254,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Rohr v. KenngottNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Matter of Mercer v. DowdNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Driscoll v. Troy Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Maguire v. MonaghanNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Murtha v. MonaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Besser v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Holtzman v. SamuelNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Abrams v. EspositoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Burrows v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Besser v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API