Legal Opinion

Boerio v. Boerio

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1936No. Appeal, 272PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This was an appeal by a wife from an order of the court below refusing to allow her counsel fees and alimony in a divorce action pending against her as respondent in that court. The order was an interlocutory one from which no appeal lies: Murray v. Murray, 78 Pa. Superior Ct. 443. We pointed out in the case of Gould v. Gould, 95 Pa. Superior Ct. 387, the distinction, in that respect, between an appeal by one who has been ordered to pay alimony, etc. and an appeal by one who has been refused alimony.

The correct practice where the court has made an order refusing counsel fees,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Gould v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Murray v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Rutherford v. RutherfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Clark v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Hanson v. HansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API