Legal Opinion

State v. Pulley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 24, 1950No. 16347PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. H. HendErsox, Acting Associate Justice.

The appellant, Grover Tojo Pulley, was indicted for a violation of section 1165 of the Code, which makes it un lawful for any one to have in possession certain named articles, or other implements or things adapted or commonly used for the commission of burglary, larceny, safe cracking, or other crime, under circumstances evincing an intent to use them in the commission of a crime. He was tried at the June, 1949, term of the Court of General Sessions for Laurens County. He was found guilty by the jury, and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KimbroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. GallmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. LynnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. HuiettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. DionisioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API