Legal Opinion
Clark v. Lansburgh & Bro., Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 17, 1941No. 5672PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PINE, District Judge.
At the trial of this action the jury returned a verdict for the defendant in the case of Alice E. Clark against Lansburgh & Bro., Inc., and for plaintiff in the amount of $500 in the case of Samuel Clark against Lansburgh & Bro., Inc.
The plaintiff Alice E. Clark claimed damages for injuries sustained by reason of a fall in the department store operated by defendant. The plaintiff Samuel Clark claimed damages for medical expenses, loss of services, etc., incident to the injuries to Alice E. Clark, his wife, as the result of such fall.
The plaintiffs brought one action under…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Womach v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Jackson v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Pessagno v. Euclid Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Smith v. MosierDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1957