Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Complainant, suing- under chapter 29, Acts of 1923, seeks a declaratory judgment (1) as to the constitutionality of chapter 10, Acts of 1897; chapter 390, Acts of 1907, that confer certain powers upon the Commission; and (2) if the Acts are valid, as to the authority of the Commission to determine the character of the employees through which complainant, as a common carrier, shall render service at its several offices, stations and depots.

The controversy relates to section 2, chapter 390, Acts of 1907, and rules promulgated by the Commission under the statute. The defendant demurred to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. LathamTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tennessee Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Tennessee Regulatory AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. Opinion With Judge Cain Specifically Concurring In Part Vi Thereof. PCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API