Legal Opinion

Blackman v. Rowe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 4, 1950No. 3901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampeon, J.

The nature of the relationship existing between the parties determines the existence and extent of the duty of care owed the plaintiff by the defendant. Sandwell v. Elliott Hospital, 92 N. H. 41, 42. The defendant, by means of newspaper advertisements and flyers, had invited the public to attend this auction of which he had full charge. In response thereto, the plaintiff, who was interested in purchasing some of the merchandise to be offered for sale, was in attendance. For the purposes of the auction the defendant assumed the position of owner or occupier of the premises in question. Frear…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Atlantic Aircraft Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Bedell v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  3. Sullivan v. Federal Cab AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Andrew Hall, Plaintiff v. Lorettann Gascard and Nikolas Gascard, DefendantsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
  5. Bedell v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API