Property Owners Ass'n of Baltimore City, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
This dispute about water arises out of the conflicting interests of natural adversaries, the landlord and the tenant. The appellee (City), caught between Scylla and Charybdis or, to use the vulgate, between a rock and a hard place, chose not to serve the interests of the landlord, whereupon the landlord, aided and abetted by other landlords, sued to compel a change of heart. The facts require attentive consideration.
The property in the eye of the controversy is in the northernmost part of Baltimore. Known as 1322 Meridene Drive, it is owned by the appellant Piccinini. On 6 September 1971 he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Crane Ice Cream Co. v. Terminal Freezing & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- State ex rel. Milsted v. Butte City Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1896
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Farmer v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Public Service Commission v. Panda-Brandywine, L.P.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003