Legal Opinion

Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co. v. Russell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county. This was a petition for dower, filed by Cornelia Russell agáinst the Calumet and Chicago Canal and Dock Company. The facts of the ease are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

Cornelia Russell, claiming to be the widow of John B. F. Russell, deceased, filed in the circuit court of Cook county her petition for dower in certain lands therein described, of which she alleged her husband was seized in fee during coverture, and who died intestate on the 3d day of January, 1862; that appellants, the Calumet and Chicago Canal and Dock Company, claim title to the premises in fee, and that she had demanded of them her dower in the same, and that they were the only party in interest besides herself. A demurrer to the petition was sustained. The petition was amended at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graham v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Lickmon v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Chauvin v. Wagner & DorsettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  4. Nantz v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
  5. Gregory's Heirs v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1845

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Albany County Savings Bank v. McCartyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Grider v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. People ex rel. Munson v. BartelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Horbach v. TyrrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Kerr v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API