Idaho Gold Dredging Corp. v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICE, District Judge.
This ease has been before this court on appeal from an order granting a new trial. The decision is found in 52 Ida. 766, 22 Pac. (2d) 147. The facts were stated in the opinion on the former appeal and it is unnecessary to restate them here.
We shall consider assignments of error by the appellant, but not in the order in which they are set out in appellant’s brief.
Appellant contends that the cause of action set forth in the third amended complaint is not assignable and hence that plaintiff is not the real party in interest. Section 54-402, I. C. A., is as follows: “A thing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Howard v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Beauchamp v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Heckaman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- MacLeod v. StelleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Coastal Industrial Water Authority v. Trinity Portland Cement Division, General Portland Cement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones v. CaseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- McKeague v. TalbertHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- Momand v. Twentieth-Century Fox Film CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.