Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided June 27, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Boyd Hickinbotham State Representative P.O. Box 326 Salem, Arkansas 72576-0326

Dear Representative Hickinbotham:

I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following question, which you have submitted on behalf of the City of Briarcliff:

Can the Briarcliff Improvement District waive delinquent assessments on lands which have gone back to the state?

In support of this request, the mayor has submitted to you the following correspondence:

As the Briarcliff Improvement District was formed under Chapter 92 as a Suburban Improvement District and not a Special…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quapaw Central Business Improvement District v. Bond-Kinman, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Turley v. St. Francis County Road Improvement District No. 4Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Spikes v. BeloateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Harris v. Little Red River Levee District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API