Legal Opinion

Turley v. St. Francis County Road Improvement District No. 4

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

St. Francis County Road Improvement District No. • 4 was organized under general-statutes of the State (Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 5399 et seq.) authorizing the creation of improvement districts by order of the county court on petition of owners of property. -The statute authorizes the collection of special taxes upon assessed benefits, payable in installments, and the foreclosure of the tax lien by action in the chan■eery court. A section of the statute (Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 5433) provides, in part, as follows:

“The tax so levied shall be a lien upon all the real property in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Cone v. Hope-Fulton-Emmett Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Gould v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Faulkner Lake Drainage District v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Spikes v. BeloateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Wyatt v. BeardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Stringer v. Conway County Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API