Legal Opinion

Beall v. Beall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1912Published

From Clackamas: James U. Campbell, Judge. This is a suit by it. Edgar Beall against John W. Beall, Portland Railway Light and Power Company, a corporation, E. C. Ramsby, county recorder, Ella M. Hildebrand, Mary Frances Wolfe, Laura H. Hamner, Birdie J. Dudrow, Arthur L. Beall, Marvin E. Beall and Jasper M. Beall. From a decree in favor of plaintiff, the defendant, John W. Beall, appeals. The respondent files motion to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion

Argued September 17, decided September 30, 1913.

On the Merits.

(135 Pac. 185.)

Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin.

This is a suit to have a deed executed about the 28th day of January, 1897, by W. J. Mead to James F. *36Beall for the property in question and intended as security for the payment of $5,000 owing by plaintiff to James F. Beall, declared to be a mortgage, and to redeem it therefrom. Plaintiff alleges that defendant John W. Beall has obtained a conveyance to himself of said property with full knowledge of the fact that plaintiff has some interest therein. A brief summary of…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Grants Pass Banking & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Senkler v. BerryOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Elliott v. BozorthOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Hall v. O'ConnellOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Albany & Santiam W. D. Co. v. CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API