Progressive Finance Co. v. Longleaf Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
A motion in arrest of judgment will lie for any defect not amendable appearing on the face of the record. Code § 110-702. A defect in the process of the court is good ground for such a motion if it is not a mere irregularity such as may be cured by the judgment. Hartridge v. McDaniel, 20 Ga. 398 (3). It appears from the record here that the motion in arrest of judgment is based in part at least upon the fact that the summons of garnishment, which is the only process in such a proceeding, called on the garnishee to answer at the January, 1963, term of court, although at the time…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Benson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Banister v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Mitchell v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Peacock v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Hogan v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. C. Samford, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1963
- Farley v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Gowen v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Rhines v. RhinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- PROGRESSIVE &C. CO. v. LONGLEAF &C. CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963