Legal Opinion

State v. Loyd

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2003No. S-02-305PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The State takes exception under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2319(3) (Reissue 1995) to the district court’s order affirming the county court’s granting of a motion to quash. The county court determined that the penalty provisions of the Omaha Mun. Code, ch. 36, art. Ill, § 36-115 (1998), were inconsistent with the penalty provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Cum. Supp. 2000). We agree that the provisions are inconsistent and overrule the State’s exception.

BACKGROUND

The appellee, Michael W. Loyd, was charged in county court with second-offense driving under the influence (DUI) under § 36-115 of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arrow Club, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Vega v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jacobson v. Solid Waste AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LoydNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. VasquezNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WarrinerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. KeenNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. HeadNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API