State v. Loyd
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
The State takes exception under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2319(3) (Reissue 1995) to the district court’s order affirming the county court’s granting of a motion to quash. The county court determined that the penalty provisions of the Omaha Mun. Code, ch. 36, art. Ill, § 36-115 (1998), were inconsistent with the penalty provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Cum. Supp. 2000). We agree that the provisions are inconsistent and overrule the State’s exception.
BACKGROUND
The appellee, Michael W. Loyd, was charged in county court with second-offense driving under the influence (DUI) under § 36-115 of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arrow Club, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Vega v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Jacobson v. Solid Waste AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LoydNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. VasquezNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WarrinerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KeenNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HeadNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.