Legal Opinion

H. Koehler & Co. v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Judgment affirmed, with costs.—Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court after a trial at Term.—

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J.:

The action was brought by the assignee of a lease and the mortgagee of personal property, against the owner of the leased premises upon which the personal property was situated. The relief sought was to establish the plaintiff’s rights in the premises under the lease, and to restrain the defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s possession. .The facts established at the trial were substantially as follows: The premises, being the store and warerooms on west side and front of cellar in house No. 228 East Forty-fifth street, New York city, were leased by the defendant to Daniel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heilman v. . LazarusNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. H. Koehler & Co. v. BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Koehler v. BradyNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. H. Koehler & Co. v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Longo v. SparanoNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API