Legal Opinion

H. Koehler & Co. v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by Peter .Doelger from an. order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of August, 1900, denying his motion to set aside a jiidgment in favor of the plaintiff theretofore entered in the action, and for leave to intervene and defend said action.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The relief originally asked for in the complaint was to restrain the defendant Brady, who was the owner of'certain real estate-known as Ho. 228 East Forty-fifth street, city of Hew York, from interfering with or disturbing the plaintiff’s possession of certain personal property upon such real property, and. from interfering with the lease of the store, a portion of the property held and owned by the plaintiff, and from interfering with the possession of said premises by the plaintiff as tenant of said property. When the action was commenced the plaintiff filed a notice of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mooney v. . N.Y. El. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. H. Koehler & Co. v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lowenstein v. ReikesNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Draper v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  3. H. Koehler & Co. v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API