Rich v. Narofsky
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
Defendant Randell Narofsky appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, Maclnnes, A.R.J.) affirming an amended divorce judgment entered in the District Court (Belfast, Staples, J.). Because the District Court abused its discretion in amending the divorce judgment to relieve Narofsky’s former spouse of her support obligation to her minor children, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Ruth (Narofsky) Rich and Randell Narof-sky were divorced pursuant to a divorce judgment entered in the District Court, that provided for shared parental…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hebert v. HebertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wrenn v. LewisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Powell v. PowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Carolan v. BellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Harvey v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Foley v. FoleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.