Burnham Manufacturing Co. v. Queen Stove Works
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
A single question is presented for decision on this appeal, namely: Was the service of the original notice upon a soliciting agent of defendant, which is a corporation under the laws of Delaware, and not authorized to do business in this state, sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the court to enter judgment? It appears from affidavits attached to the motion to quash that H. G-. Olson, upon whom notice was served, was a salesman calling largely upon dealers in hardware in Minnesota and Iowa. His authority was to solicit and take orders for. merchandise and forward the same to Albert Lea,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Bank of America v. Whitney Central National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- American Asphalt Roof Corp. v. ShanklandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. LovejoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Wells Fargo & Co. of Mexico v. McArthur Bros. Mercantile Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Wyman, Partridge Holding Co. v. LoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Dorsey v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.