Pielow v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were found guilty under an indictment which charged them, together with one Hagen, with a conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et seq.). In Hagen v. United States (C. C. A.) 4. F.(2d) 801, we held that the search warrant which was issued in this case, and under which certain goods and papers were seized, was absolutely void for want of a proper sustaining affidavit, and the judgment was reversed as to Hagen. The same judgment must be entered as to Pielow and Givens. Pielow resided on the premises…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Mellet & Nichter Brewing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clarke v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Jeffers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- United States v. PeteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
- United States v. LesterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- United States v. ElkinsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.