United States v. Pete
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
LAWS, Chief Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion to suppress evidence which she had admittedly embezzled and turned over to another for safe-keeping. The property was seized in the unlawful arrest of the party to whom defendant had given the property. No search of premises was involved. The question is whether defendant may avail herself of the wrongful seizure from another of property identified as fruits of crime.
*293By the decision of Jeffers v. United States, 1950, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 58, 187 F.2d 498, affirmed 1951, 342 U.S. 48, 72 S.Ct. 93, 96 L.Ed. 59, it is established that the infringement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Jeffers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Pielow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. TuneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- United States v. PeltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.