James W. v. Claudine W.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
David H. appeals an order allowing visitation between his son C.H. and C.H.’s stepfather, James W. David challenges the constitutionality *71of Family Code section 31011 which gives the trial court discretion to order stepparent visitation. We hold that the application of section 3101 in this case violated David’s substantive due process right to the care, custody and control of his child by failing to apply a presumption that a parent’s decision regarding visitation is in the best interest of the child. (Troxel v. Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57 [147 L.Ed.2d 49, 120 S.Ct. 2054]…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re BGCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Detrich v. Carolyn B.California Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chalmers v. HirschkopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rich v. ThatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- S.V. v. J.M.California Court of Appeal · 2006