Legal Opinion

American Clipper Corp. v. Howerton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 119A81PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

This case was brought as a declaratory judgment action to determine which party has superior title or security interest in a particular recreational vehicle. On stipulated facts and a “Partial Settlement Agreement,” Judge Riddle, presiding at the 6 June 1980 Session of Guilford County Superior Court, entered summary judgment for plaintiff American Clipper Corporation (hereinafter Clipper). The Court of Appeals affirmed.

The basis for the Court of Appeals’ decision was its conclusion that the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act (MVA), specifically section 20-52.1, governed the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nasco Equipment Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Wood Chevrolet Co. v. Bank of the SoutheastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Hawkins v. M & J FINANCE CORP.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dorton v. DortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Canterra Petroleum, Inc. v. Western Drilling & Mining SupplyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. In re ES2 Sports & Leisure, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
  5. Carter v. Holland (In Re Carraway)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API