Legal Opinion

Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1994No. 93-674PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Judge.

The employer/servicing agent appeal a workers’ compensation order awarding payment of the claimant’s attorney’s fee. We conclude that the amount awarded is not excessive, except insofar as it encompasses time spent establishing the amount of the fee. Such time, expended here after entry of the merits order in which fee entitlement was established, has been excluded from the fee predicate since the supreme court’s ruling in Crittenden Orange Blossom Fruit v. Stone, 514 So.2d 351 (Fla.1987). See, e.g., Regal Wood Products v. Baschansci, 603 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Dobbs v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crittenden Orange Blossom Fruit v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Dobbs v. Suncoast AcousticsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Regal Wood Products v. BaschansciDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pullen Bros. v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API