Legal Opinion

Pullen Bros. v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 10, 1995No. 95-950Published

1Opinion of the Court

KAHN, Judge.

Appellant, the employer/carrier (E/C) in this workers’ compensation claim, challenge an attorney’s fee awarded to counsel for appellee. Appellant first argues that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) erred in the amount of the attorney’s fee because numerous hours claimed were for time spent unrelated to any of the benefits secured. The E/C presented an expert witness who found the time claimed to be excessive. The record, however, also contains evidence in the form of testimony given by claimant’s attorney, Mr. Smith, that his involvement “in this case from the very first day…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crittenden Orange Blossom Fruit v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Department of Transportation/Division of Risk Management v. LoganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API