Legal Opinion
DeVita v. City of Poughkeepsie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 22, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of a claim to real property, the plaintiff, Edward DeVita, and the defendant Harold Jennings, jointly appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated November 27, 2000, which, among other things, granted the motion of the defendant Louis Snell for summary judgment on his counterclaim and cross claim and denied their respective cross motions for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McCann v. ScadutoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quinn v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- NYCTL 1998-1 Trust v. Prol Properties Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Preferred Group of Manhattan, Inc. v. City of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018