Micalden Investments S.A. v. Rostropovich
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Micalden Investments S.A. (“Micalden”) brought this action against defendants Olga Rostropovich (“Rostropovich”), Atoosa P. Mamdani and Mahmoud A. Mamdani (collectively, the “Mamdan-is”), Cooley Godward Kronish L.L.P. (“CGK”), and Renee Schwartz (“Schwartz”) (collectively, “Defendants”) to declare the validity of a Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”) lien on the shares of a cooperative apartment and to direct the sale of such shares or, in the alternate, damages. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Gregory v. DalyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Frank D. Jones v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs and New York State Army National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McDaniel v. 162 Columbia Heights Housing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2008