Legal Opinion
Body v. Watkins
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 16, 2002No. 01-1556PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT**
2Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner Kennith L. Body, Jr., a state prisoner appearing pro se, appeals from the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. We previously granted Mr. Body a certificate of appealability (COA) under 28 U.S.C. §…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Smallwood v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Patterson v. American Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Clark v. McLemoreDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Body v. Watkins, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Carr v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Strong (ID 31810) v. HeimgartnerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020