Bohmont v. Moore
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentSimmons, C. J.
I agree with the majority that this is an action “to recover damages for the breach of a bailment contract.” I agree that plaintiff alleged that the defendant bank and its officers were negligent in not properly caring for and protecting the money which plaintiff alleges he placed *97in the safety deposit box which he rented from the defendant bank. I agree that plaintiff considered that negligence was an “essential element” of the case. I disagree with their conclusion that because of the allegation as to negligence the action was not “one in contract.” This conclusion is based on the fact that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Mayer v. BrensingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Sulpho-Saline Bath Co. v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.