Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bohmont v. Moore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1942No. 31275Published

1DissentSimmons, C. J.

I agree with the majority that this is an action “to recover damages for the breach of a bailment contract.” I agree that plaintiff alleged that the defendant bank and its officers were negligent in not properly caring for and protecting the money which plaintiff alleges he placed *97in the safety deposit box which he rented from the defendant bank. I agree that plaintiff considered that negligence was an “essential element” of the case. I disagree with their conclusion that because of the allegation as to negligence the action was not “one in contract.” This conclusion is based on the fact that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mayer v. BrensingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Sulpho-Saline Bath Co. v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API