Legal Opinion

Yamaha Motor Co., LTD. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2009No. G041255PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

This court issued an OSC (order to show cause) in response to this petition for writ of mandate because it presents an issue of some public importance that has not yet been squarely faced by a California state court, in a published opinion, in this particular context: The question of whether a Japanese manufacturer can be served under California law simply by serving the Japanese manufacturer’s American subsidiary. The trial court ruled that a Japanese manufacturer could indeed be validly served that way. The method just seemed too easy a way to get around the Hague Service…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Honda Motor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Falco v. Nissan North America Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  2. United States Ex Rel. Miller v. Public Warehousing Co. KSCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Bluestone Investment Inc., et al. v. Qizhong Hu, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  4. Cavanaugh v. Roland CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
  5. Dutrisac v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API