Legal Opinion

United States v. Vendivel

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 16, 1993No. ACM 30284, 30300Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES, Judge:

Recently we held that R.C.M. 707, our current Executive speedy trial rule, should be applied according to its clear provisions: It governs cases in which arraignment occurs on or after July 6, 1991. Exec. Order No. 12,767, § 4d (June 27, 1991), 56 Fed. Reg. 30,284, 3 C.F.R.-(19 — ); United States v. Shim, 36 M.J. 1124 (A.F.C.M.R. 1993). That holding introduces new complexity when the charges include lengthy absence offenses under Article 85 (desertion) or 86 (absence without leave), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 885-86 (1988). The present cases are such cases, but we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API