United States v. Vendivel
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES, Judge:
Recently we held that R.C.M. 707, our current Executive speedy trial rule, should be applied according to its clear provisions: It governs cases in which arraignment occurs on or after July 6, 1991. Exec. Order No. 12,767, § 4d (June 27, 1991), 56 Fed. Reg. 30,284, 3 C.F.R.-(19 — ); United States v. Shim, 36 M.J. 1124 (A.F.C.M.R. 1993). That holding introduces new complexity when the charges include lengthy absence offenses under Article 85 (desertion) or 86 (absence without leave), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 885-86 (1988). The present cases are such cases, but we…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.