Legal Opinion
Teitelbaum v. South Florida Water Management District
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 30, 2015No. 14-0963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
ROTHENBERG, J.
We grant the appellants’ motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion filed June 24, 2015, and issue the following opinion in its stead.
Ann Teitelbaum and a group of private property owners (“the Plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment against their claims for inverse condemnation and de facto constitutional takings in violation of their due process rights, which they pursued under a theory of “condemnation blight.” However, Florida law is quite clear that condemnation blight, while relevant to the valuation of property…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Tampa-Hillsborough Expressway v. AGWSSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Comm. v. William Daws, Jr. and Ouida GershonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Bank of New York Mellon v. GlenvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Clark v. CascioDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Comm. v. William Daws, Jr. and Ouida GershonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018