Legal Opinion

Woody v. Walters

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided March 30, 1999No. 5:97CV165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THORNBURG, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on motions for summary judgment filed by the Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons stated below, the Court allows the Defendants’ motions, and dismisses the Plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Beatrice C. Woody was employed by Defendant Thomasville Upholstery, Inc. (hereinafter “Thomasville”), and its predecessor company for approximately ten years, beginning in 1984. See Affidavit of Richard 0. Millen, dated January 28, 1999, attached to Defendants’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  2. Gasper v. EIDP, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API