Legal Opinion

Schillinger v. Middleton

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 12, 1887Published

In Equity. Bill for injunction to restrain infringement of complainant’s letters patent.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This suit is brought by the plaintiff, a citizen of- New York, against the defendants William A. Middleton, a citizen of Oregon, Mary Hueston, a citizen of New Jersey, and the Oregon Artificial Stone *737Company, a corporation formed under the laws of Oregon, to have them enjoined from infringing his patent for an “improvement in concrete pavement. ”

The original letters were issued to the plaintiff on July 19, 1870, and numbered 105,599. On May 2, 1871, there was a reissue, numbered 4,861. From the specification annexed thereto, it appears that John .1. Seliillinger has “invented a new and useful…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. California Paving Co. v. SchalickeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. PerineUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
  4. Schillinger v. GuntherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1877
  5. Schillinger v. Greenway Brewing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API