Legal Opinion

California Paving Co. v. Schalicke

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 20, 1886No. 940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL FEOM THE CIEOUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTEICT OF CALIFOENIA. Bill in equity to restrain infringements of letters-patent* The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatohfoed

delivered the opinion of the court..

This is a suit in equity, brought by the California Artificial Stone Paving Company, a California corporation, against F. W. Schalicke, to recover for the infringement of reissued let ters-patent No. .4364, granted to-John J. Schillinger, May 2d, 18Y1, for an improvement in concrete pavements,-on the surrender-of original letters-patent No. 105,559, granted to him July 19th, 18Y0. The specification and drawings of the'reissued patent are as follows:

“ Figure 1 represents a plan of my pavement. Figure 2 -is a vertical section of the same. Similar letters…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Hurlbut v. SchillingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. In re CookU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1892
  4. Hill v. SawyerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
  5. Sackett v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API