Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Bankston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.
This action was to recover damages for personal injuries to plaintiff, and for the destruction of his automobile, caused by a collision between a street car and the automobile in which plaintiff and two others were at the time riding. Plaintiff’s cause of action was based, in part, on -negligence per se, arising from alleged violation of certain ordinances of the city of Dallas and, in part, on negligence arising from the alleged breach by defendant of its Common Law duty to use due care.
The pertinent provisions of the ordinances involved are these: Article 1S81, as follows: “The motorman *of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Osborne v. McMastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Sluder v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McDaniel Bros. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Fletcher v. BordelonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Kincaid v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.