Legal Opinion

Norval Smith v. Thomas Brady and Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1968No. 11450_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants in this action for personal injuries seek to vacate a judgment of $22,500 on grounds that it is excessive and the result of prejudicial references by the trial judge to the ad damnum clause of the complaint. They challenge these portions of the charge which followed proper explanation of the measure and elements of the plaintiff’s damages:

“ * * * (The jury may) allow such damages as * * * will be a fair and just compensation for the injury which the plaintiff has sustained, not to exceed the sum of one hundred thousand dollars, the amount claimed in plaintiff’s complaint.
“The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shelby v. Williams and Horney Livestock, Incorporated v. Joseph E. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  2. Riggs, Ferris & Geer v. Harrison LillibridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Middle-West Concrete Forming & Equipment Co. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Elsey Ford Sales, Inc. v. SolomanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Miller v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Chroniak v. Golden Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Douglas v. McCartyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API