Washington Cranberry Growers Ass'n v. Moore
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Hewen, J., entered December 18, 1920, in favor of the plaintiff:, in an action for an injunction, tried to the court.
1DissentMackintosh, J.
(dissenting) — For the reason that I think the opinion in this case states an unsound principle of law, I am forced to dissent.
Upon the question whether the contract under consideration is void as against public policy, or the provisions of the state constitution in regard to monopoly and trusts, or under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, there may be a very serious question, and that the contract should be held void there is supporting argument in the recent decisions of the United States supreme court in the cases of American Column & Lumber Co. v. United States, U. S. Adv. Ops. 1921-22, p. 159,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Javierre v. Central AltagraciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.