Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Halland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1914No. Nos. 18,774-(21)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $200. The case was tried before Nye, J., who denied defendant’s motion to direct a verdict in his favor, and a jury which returned a verdict for $88 in favor of plaintiff. Defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial was denied. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

1. Plaintiff’s team of horses was being driven along the highway by his son; defendant was operating his automobile upon the same *189highway in an opposite direction. When the team and the automobile met, the horses became frightened, unmanageable, and ran out of the road into a shallow ditch extending parallel therewith, and one of the horses received such injuries from violent exertions to escape the automobile that he subsequently died. In this action to recover the value of the horse, defendant was charged with negligence in operating his car at an excessive rate of speed, and in making no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christy v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Ploetz v. HoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Strand v. Grinnell Automobile Garage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Cumberland Telp. & Telg. Co. v. YeiserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Pfeiffer v. RadkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API