Legal Opinion

Cumberland Telp. & Telg. Co. v. Yeiser

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 2, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

The horse appellee was driving became frightened at an automobile in charge of the employes of the appellant company, and as a result lie was thrown or fell out of a two-wlieeled cart in which he was riding. To recover damages for injuries sustained by the fall, he brought this suit, and upon a trial obtained a judgment for $1,755.00.

The appellee insists that the trial court should have directed a verdict in its favor, and this question we will first consider. The facts and circumstances surrounding the injury as we gather them from .the record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conway v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. WareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  3. National Casket Co. v. PowarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Webb v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pryor's Administrator v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Lieberman v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Giles v. VoilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Union Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API