Legal Opinion

Dorrance v. Pennsylvania Fire Ins.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 25, 1951No. 29454PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs on an insurance policy issued by the defendant, Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Company, insuring certain personal property of plaintiffs against loss or damage occasioned by theft. The policy was a so-called Personal Property Floater Policy which covered a certain natural wild mink coat insured for $4,500.00, a pair of diamond and ruby earrings insured for $350.00, and miscellaneous items of jewelry and other personal property insured for $3,033.00. The defendant has admitted liability for the earrings in the sum of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. California Cotton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. O'Connor v. Maryland Motor Car InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Francis v. Iowa National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Estrada v. Queen Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Ramirez v. United Firemen's Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Niehaus v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API