Legal Opinion
Betts v. Railroad Commission
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 5, 1933No. Z-6-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COSGRAVE, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed his bill of complaint on January 25, 1933, to enjoin the Railroad Commission of the State of California and its officers from enforcing two certain orders heretofore made by the Commission directed against plaintiff and, pending the hearing of the ease, to grant an interlocutory injunction. Since plaintiff thus sought to restrain the execution of an order of an administrative board acting under the statutes of the state, the application for interlocutory injunction was heard by three judges. 28 USCA § 380. The motion of the Railroad Commission to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Funeral Dirs. Ass'n. v. Bd. of Funeral Dirs. & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re Federal Water & Gas Corp. Appeal of Chenery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Lambert v. Central Bank of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1941
- Betts v. Railroad Commission of the State of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.