Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Landfield

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 8, 1991No. 1-88-3672PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murray

George S. Landfield (George) and Joy Landfield (Joy) appeal and cross-appeal respectively from a final decree in a domestic relations case that began over 10 years ago. The issues presented for review are: (1) the trial court’s classification of certain property as marital; (2) the property division made by the trial judge; (3) the trial court’s valuation of certain property; (4) the maintenance given to Joy; (5) attorney fees awarded; (6) whether section 508 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (IMDMA) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 40, par. 101 et seq.) provides for the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hofmann v. HofmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. McElroy v. ForceIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Canady v. CanadyIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. In Re Marriage of RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of HagshenasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. In Re Marriage of WeilerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. In Re Marriage of PhillipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. In Re Marriage of MarriottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. In Re Marriage of CervenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API