Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1933No. 24590. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blake, J.—

By information, filed February 26, 1932, by the prosecuting attorney of King county, defendant was charged with the crime of grand larceny on nineteen counts. By information filed July 23, 1932, he was charged with the crime of forgery on three counts.- The causes were consolidated for trial, and the jury returned verdicts of guilty on all three counts of the forgery information and on sixteen counts of the grand larceny information. From judgment and sentence on the verdicts, defendant appeals—the cases being consolidated on appeal.

Appellant assigns error as follows:

“(1) In…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. HughlettWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Clement v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. State v. SurryWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State v. LindenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Godefroy v. HuppWashington Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sutton v. MathewsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. ChambersWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. KaiserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API