Legal Opinion

United States v. Wakeman

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 19, 1987No. ACMR 8700022PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of signing a false official record and unauthorized sale of military property (three specifications) in violation of Articles 107 and 108, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907 and 908 (1982). The ad*645judged sentence of dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El was approved by the convening authority.

Appellant asserts his court-martial lacked jurisdiction because the charges were not properly…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. WarnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. FrangoulesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. PooleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. JeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. BowenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. FriersonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. ConfortiU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. AntonitisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API