Legal Opinion

Landstrom v. Krettler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 8, 1982No. 81-164PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn

Petitioner Lawrence Landstrom, executor and contingent residuary beneficiary of the estate of Ellen Setterfield, appeals from the trial court’s order awarding decedent’s silverware to Jane Krettler, a named beneficiary under the decedent’s will. The trial court interpreted the bequest to Krettler of “personal effects, jewelry and furniture” to include decedent’s silverware, despite the fact that no specific bequest of “silverware” was set forth in any provision of the will. Landstrom contends the trial court erred in its interpretation, and he claims the trial court’s ruling is both lacking…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leary v. KerberIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Mokros v. BlackmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  3. Boyle v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. In Re Lathrop EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
  5. Earle v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. Sverid v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. In re Estate of LightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Radley v. WollandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Robert Sarvis v. BMO Harris Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API