Legal Opinion

Henley v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 2017No. 2014EAB1215; A157790Published

1Opinion of the Court

FLYNN, J., pro tempore

Claimant seeks judicial review of a final order of the Employment Appeals Board (board), which concluded that he was not entitled to unemployment benefits because he voluntarily left work without good cause. See ORS 657.176(2)(c). We conclude that the board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, affirm.

We take the facts from the board’s findings and from the undisputed evidence in the record that is not inconsistent with those findings. See Warkentin v. Employment Dept., 245 Or App 128, 130, 261 P3d 72 (2011). Claimant had worked for employer for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warkentin v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Kercher v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API